Possible errata?

Old School Revival at its best?

Moderator: Blacky the Blackball

Post Reply
User avatar
Artikid
Hobgoblin
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2019 4:31 pm
Gender: male
Location: Italy
Contact:

Possible errata?

Post by Artikid »

Hi, I've noticed a few things I'm not sure about:


Limited access to wands and staves:
I'm quite sure that Becmi allowed elves to use wands and staffs like Magic-users do. The restrictions might be an error, a result of the jumbled mess known as the RC. (edit: checked this out, both BX and Becmi allow elves to use staffs and wands marked as (m), or magic-user only)

Thieves:
Didn't the source material give them access to all weapons? (checked out, no this isn't the case in Becmi. BX gave them access to all weapons, though)
Finally a piece that is not really errata: lots of people seem to think that the thief is too weak, and even bad at his own class skills. This fact is usually imputed to Becmi changing the progression and improvement from levels 1-14 (like it was in BX) to 1-36. Is there a chance that a 3rd printing will use the BX table for thief skills?

Thanks
Last edited by Artikid on Fri Mar 01, 2019 10:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Illustrator for hire, my Patreon campaign: https://www.patreon.com/artikid
My online gallery https://artikid.deviantart.com

User avatar
Artikid
Hobgoblin
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2019 4:31 pm
Gender: male
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: Possible errata?

Post by Artikid »

After a few days more of browsing the book I found more potential Errata.
  • Adamants, Angels and Demons are both listed as Exalted, yet Demons and Adamants save as Immortals and Angels save as Mortals.
    Shouldn't Angels save as Immortals too?
  • Elemental Rulers (40 HD Elementals) are listed as Exalted, but no specific ST table is given... maybe Immortal saves should be listed here as well?
  • Another thing that might potentially be Errata is that no Carrying capacity is given for monsters that could end up as mounts for high level PCs, like Griffon or Manticore.
I think I may have more after a careful read through, but it may take a couple of weeks at least.
Illustrator for hire, my Patreon campaign: https://www.patreon.com/artikid
My online gallery https://artikid.deviantart.com

User avatar
Artikid
Hobgoblin
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2019 4:31 pm
Gender: male
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: Possible errata?

Post by Artikid »

In addition Angels are missing a Power Reserve.
Illustrator for hire, my Patreon campaign: https://www.patreon.com/artikid
My online gallery https://artikid.deviantart.com

User avatar
Artikid
Hobgoblin
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2019 4:31 pm
Gender: male
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: Possible errata?

Post by Artikid »

No Sorceror nor Shaman level caps are given for centaurs, djinns, dryads, doppelganger, efreeti, lizardmen, nuckalave, orcs, sasquatch,, sprites, troglodytes, trolls and vampires.
Illustrator for hire, my Patreon campaign: https://www.patreon.com/artikid
My online gallery https://artikid.deviantart.com

User avatar
Artikid
Hobgoblin
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2019 4:31 pm
Gender: male
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: Possible errata?

Post by Artikid »

This would actually be addenda rather than errata: write wrestling rules that do not imitate BECMI's. Model them instead on the way nets work in the weapon feats chapter.
Illustrator for hire, my Patreon campaign: https://www.patreon.com/artikid
My online gallery https://artikid.deviantart.com

User avatar
Peter
Gnoll
Posts: 97
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 12:54 am
Gender: male

Re: Possible errata?

Post by Peter »

Thank you for the errata. I am pretty sure Blacky moved on to 5th Edition, but I will incorporate it into my unfinished deluxe version.
Finally a piece that is not really errata: lots of people seem to think that the thief is too weak, and even bad at his own class skills. This fact is usually imputed to Becmi changing the progression and improvement from levels 1-14 (like it was in BX) to 1-36. Is there a chance that a 3rd printing will use the BX table for thief skills?
This is already done in my version. I plan to replace the class with a rewrite of Frank Mentzer's Thief rewrite.
Adamants, Angels and Demons are both listed as Exalted, yet Demons and Adamants save as Immortals and Angels save as Mortals.
Shouldn't Angels save as Immortals too?
The Angel is the Archon from the RC, which list it's save as C20.
Elemental Rulers (40 HD Elementals) are listed as Exalted, but no specific ST table is given... maybe Immortal saves should be listed here as well?
I assume they have the same saves as regular elementals, as the RC says "These slow, huge creatures are identical to
normal elementals, but far larger." Although it would make sense that they have different saves.

User avatar
Artikid
Hobgoblin
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2019 4:31 pm
Gender: male
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: Possible errata?

Post by Artikid »

Hi,
I hope Blacky hasn't completely abandoned the game, at least as far as errata correction goes.
I don't even know if he'd agree to all I posted as being "errata" but I feel compelled to make these posts anyway.

Yes I know that Angels are taken from the Archos in the original game.
But I think that they need to be corrected and be treated like practically all existing Exalted creatures in the game.

Elemental rulers in the RC save as 36th level fighters, way better than normal Elementals.
But. In the RC they are not Exalted creatures, while they are in Dark Dungeons.
Just like Angels, it would be nice if they fit in what seems to be the general mold for Exalted beings. At the moment they have no ST listing at all.
Illustrator for hire, my Patreon campaign: https://www.patreon.com/artikid
My online gallery https://artikid.deviantart.com

User avatar
Blacky the Blackball
White Dragon
Posts: 2102
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 7:47 am
Gender: male
Location: Brighton, UK
Contact:

Re: Possible errata?

Post by Blacky the Blackball »

As I'm working through the new edition, I thought I'd go through some of these and respond to them with how I am (or am not) addressing them...
Artikid wrote:
Mon Feb 18, 2019 11:01 pm
Limited access to wands and staves:
I'm quite sure that Becmi allowed elves to use wands and staffs like Magic-users do. The restrictions might be an error, a result of the jumbled mess known as the RC. (edit: checked this out, both BX and Becmi allow elves to use staffs and wands marked as (m), or magic-user only)
Yep, that's an error that I'll be correcting. Both elves and magic-users (and mountebanks) should be able to use staffs and wands marked as (m).
Thieves:
Didn't the source material give them access to all weapons? (checked out, no this isn't the case in Becmi. BX gave them access to all weapons, though)
Finally a piece that is not really errata: lots of people seem to think that the thief is too weak, and even bad at his own class skills. This fact is usually imputed to Becmi changing the progression and improvement from levels 1-14 (like it was in BX) to 1-36. Is there a chance that a 3rd printing will use the BX table for thief skills?
I've not done this, because I prefer the more gradual increase in skills rather than a steep one for the first few levels and then it tailing off because there's nowhere for it to go after that. Don't forget that level 14 is less than half way through the progression and if they peak that early then small increments after that point seem irrelevant.

What I will do, though, is put in a "Developer Commentary" box in the Dungeon Delving chapter mentioning that thieves have only low chances of success at low levels so the DM shouldn't be afraid to put in sub-standard or crude traps and locks that give a bonus to handling them in order to give low level thieves a chance to shine.
Artikid wrote:
Tue Feb 26, 2019 12:21 am
Adamants, Angels and Demons are both listed as Exalted, yet Demons and Adamants save as Immortals and Angels save as Mortals.

Shouldn't Angels save as Immortals too?
Artikid wrote:
Tue Feb 26, 2019 5:57 pm
In addition Angels are missing a Power Reserve.
That's because Adamants and Demons are immune to mortal magic, while Angels aren't. The reason for that is because Angels were taken from the Rules Cyclopedia and Adamants and Demons were taken from Wrath of the Immortals.

I'm going to need to clean up the whole issue of Exalted creatures when I clean up the Immortals rules, so one way or another things will be more consistent in the new edition.
Elemental Rulers (40 HD Elementals) are listed as Exalted, but no specific ST table is given... maybe Immortal saves should be listed here as well?
Similarly, I'll deal with this when I clean up the Immortals rules.
Another thing that might potentially be Errata is that no Carrying capacity is given for monsters that could end up as mounts for high level PCs, like Griffon or Manticore.
I might simply go right ahead and include them in the equipment chapter as mounts, although that's a slippery slope since there are always more obscure mounts (pegasi, unicorns, dragons, flail snails...)
Artikid wrote:
Wed Feb 27, 2019 10:39 pm
No Sorceror nor Shaman level caps are given for centaurs, djinns, dryads, doppelganger, efreeti, lizardmen, nuckalave, orcs, sasquatch,, sprites, troglodytes, trolls and vampires.
I'll fix that when I get to the monster chapter.
Artikid wrote:
Sun Mar 10, 2019 3:52 pm
This would actually be addenda rather than errata: write wrestling rules that do not imitate BECMI's. Model them instead on the way nets work in the weapon feats chapter.
I've already done that, although I modeled them on the Bolas rather than the Net - since I figured that the Bolas' strangulation rules were a reasonable thing to use for choke-holds.
Check out Gurbintroll Games for my free RPGs (including Dark Dungeons and FASERIP)!

(I'm a moderator for "The Orc's Revenge" and its sub-forums. If I need to post anything officially as a mod, rather than just as a user, I'll post it in green.)

User avatar
Artikid
Hobgoblin
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2019 4:31 pm
Gender: male
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: Possible errata?

Post by Artikid »

Thanks for the clarifications. One thing I didn't understand, is Dark Dungeons still going to be published in its current form?
Illustrator for hire, my Patreon campaign: https://www.patreon.com/artikid
My online gallery https://artikid.deviantart.com

User avatar
Blacky the Blackball
White Dragon
Posts: 2102
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 7:47 am
Gender: male
Location: Brighton, UK
Contact:

Re: Possible errata?

Post by Blacky the Blackball »

I'm going to stick the 10th edition version up on DriveThruRPG, but I won't take the old version down. That will still be available.
Check out Gurbintroll Games for my free RPGs (including Dark Dungeons and FASERIP)!

(I'm a moderator for "The Orc's Revenge" and its sub-forums. If I need to post anything officially as a mod, rather than just as a user, I'll post it in green.)

User avatar
Artikid
Hobgoblin
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2019 4:31 pm
Gender: male
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: Possible errata?

Post by Artikid »

Blacky the Blackball wrote:
Sat Jan 04, 2020 11:18 pm
I'm going to stick the 10th edition version up on DriveThruRPG, but I won't take the old version down. That will still be available.
Cool! I guess it won't include this errata, though?
Illustrator for hire, my Patreon campaign: https://www.patreon.com/artikid
My online gallery https://artikid.deviantart.com

User avatar
Blacky the Blackball
White Dragon
Posts: 2102
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 7:47 am
Gender: male
Location: Brighton, UK
Contact:

Re: Possible errata?

Post by Blacky the Blackball »

Unfortunately not, since that would require not only a lot of work to update the files (which aren't the same as the files for the new edition that I'm currently editing), but then also work and expense on my part to turn those files into an updated book.

From a cost point of view, it's actually much cheaper for me to publish a separate 10th anniversary edition than it is to republish an errata-ed version of the old edition.
Check out Gurbintroll Games for my free RPGs (including Dark Dungeons and FASERIP)!

(I'm a moderator for "The Orc's Revenge" and its sub-forums. If I need to post anything officially as a mod, rather than just as a user, I'll post it in green.)

Post Reply

Return to “Dark Dungeons”